Incorporating adverse event relatedness into dose-finding clinical trial designs

A tolerability burden index in schizophrenia: incorporating patient perspective in clinical trial adverse event reporting

Background: Adverse event (AE) reporting in clinical trials does not fully capture the patient-level perspective and comparing tolerability across treatments or among studies is difficult. Objective: This study was designed to develop a treatment tolerability index algorithm that combines AE reporting with physician- and patient-level AE information into a global burden score to allow compariso...

Practical considerations for optimal designs in clinical dose finding studies.

A key objective in the clinical development of a medicinal drug is the determination of an adequate dose level and, more broadly, the characterization of its dose response relationship. If the dose is set too high, safety and tolerability problems are likely to result, while selecting too low a dose makes it difficult to establish adequate efficacy in the confirmatory phase, possibly leading to...

Dose-finding Designs for Phase Ii Clinical Trials

Optimal designs for dose finding studies

Identifying the “right” dose is one of the most critical and difficult steps in the clinical development process of any medicinal drug. Its importance cannot be understated: selecting too high a dose can result in unacceptable toxicity and associated safety problems, while choosing too low a dose leads to smaller chances of showing sufficient efficacy in confirmatory trials, thus reducing the c...

Continual Reassessment and Related Dose-Finding Designs.

During the last twenty years there have been considerable methodological developments in the design and analysis of Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 1/2 dose-finding studies. Many of these developments are related to the continual reassessment method (CRM), first introduced by O'Quigley, Pepe and Fisher (1990). CRM models have proven themselves to be of practical use and, in this discussion, we inves...